Boom drop the mic!
On 05/23/2017 07:56 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
One vote for Force180
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On May 23, 2017 8:21 AM, "Faisal Imtiaz" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
FWIW...... the situation described is the exact scenario for a
Micro-POP.
There are a number of folks who are currently doing such a setup
with 60ghz or 24ghz as backhaul and Mimosa A5's for 5ghz PTMP...
expected thruput is between 150meg to 300meg easily.
Regards.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <tel:%28305%29%20663-5518>
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <tel:%28305%29%20663-5518> Option 2 or
Email: [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Harold Bledsoe" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Tuesday, May 23, 2017 6:26:37 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] extending fiber with RF
How about 60ghz to the first house and 5ghz to the second
house and run Trill to create a ring?
Does using multiple new technologies instead of just one make
it seem less risky? š
Hal
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:47 PM Chuck McCown <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Scared of new technology.
Seems a bit too long range for that freq.
Worried about not enough time has elapsed to prove them out.
They sound expensive.
Everybody knows 60 GHz is all absorbed by the oxygen anyhow...
Not sure God would approve...
You all the same normal reasons...
*From:* Brett A Mansfield
*Sent:* Monday, May 22, 2017 1:44 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] extending fiber with RF
For so little throughput a 5GHz setup would be the
cheapest and probably best setup.
What keeps you from being a believer of the 60GHz? I can
show you the history of some of my Ignitenet links that
may just change your mind.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On May 22, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Chuck McCown
<[email protected]> wrote:
Not a believer yet. And we only need 100-250 Mbps max
to the homes. Actually probably more like 50 or 100
Mbps.
Want it to be simple too. ONT has multiple ethernet
ports on it. Just extend those physical layer 0/1
connections.
*From:* Cameron Crum
*Sent:* Monday, May 22, 2017 1:34 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] extending fiber with RF
What about a couple of 60GHz links with a single 5GHz
AP as a backup? We did this for a bank that needed to
connect two buildings temporarily. Put a MT on either
side that ran IPSEC tunnel over the link with a
failover script to route traffic over the 5 GHz link
if the 60 lost more than 50% of it's packets. The 5
GHz was slower, but they still had connectivity in the
even of a heavy rain.
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Chuck McCown
<[email protected]> wrote:
Still puzzling over how to get ethernet the last
3000 feet. I have fiber to a point along a rural
road. The end is about 2000 feet from one home and
3000 feet from another.
Was looking at using the existing copper with VDSL
line extenders. That was what that week of math
problems was all about. I am starting to lean
away from that solution because it is old copper.
I really want to stop using it.
I donāt have a ROW that is legal. The old copper
technically is in trespass and the owner of the
property is known to be a major PITA. So not sure
if I can get permission. Even then, we are talking
about 5000 feet of fiber to place. There will be
some money involved.
Using wireless could be much cheaper. Will have
to do a solar install with the ONT and RF gear on
a stub pole at the handhole.
Not sure what kid of RF. Donāt want to use an AP
because I need two layer 2 connections from the
ONT. Be more expensive to use an AP anyhow. So
two PTP systems. Rock solid, never fail type of
system. Noise floor down there is probably pretty
low.
I could use a pair of rockets etc. Not wanting to
lo-ball this, want it to be very solid.
What would you use?
--
Harold Bledsoe
--
