Let me try adding one more thing. IEEE 1588 is rather complex, cambium sync is a lot simpler. Some industries already use IEEE 1588 so for those it makes sense for cambium to support. Not sure if it does for this industry
On Jun 17, 2017 12:20 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" < [email protected]> wrote: > IEEE 1588 ... and not sure. > > On Jun 17, 2017 12:05 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So, where does it fit in the picture? >> Is the L2 packet thing deployed or planned? >> What is shipping with the current product? >> >> *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account) >> *Sent:* Saturday, June 17, 2017 11:02 AM >> *To:* af >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync >> >> The l2 packet solution isnt what they're calling cambium sync. >> >> On Jun 17, 2017 11:57 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Canopy sync was originally a one second pulse on the sync wires on the >>> RJ11 jack. >>> Then they added sync over power which interrupted the POE current for a >>> few microseconds once a second. >>> >>> Cambium sync, at least the one Forrest has talked about, uses some kind >>> of L2 ethernet timing packet to send the sync over ethernet. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Matt >>> Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:50 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync >>> >>> So how does Canopy sync over power differ from Cambium sync? >>> >>
