>From what you are saying it sounds like it is simplified version of 1588? >Something that is part of the ethernet rather than applied at the physical >layer. It also sounds like there is an NDA in place...
From: Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 11:25 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync Did't need to... On Jun 17, 2017 12:22 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: Have you done any reverse engineering on it yet? From: Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:57 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync Cambium sync uses a different method of injecting the sync pulse which is more compatible with high power and gigabit data. They aren't close to the same. I can't be more specific than that. On Jun 17, 2017 11:50 AM, "Matt" <[email protected]> wrote: So how does Canopy sync over power differ from Cambium sync?
