They send and receive the sync pulse one second forward in time so we
don't ever need to see it. It's just a tiny lower-power version of the
flux capacitor on the board. That's why the 450m needs only 70 watts and
not 1.21 jigawatts.
On 6/17/2017 12:27 PM, [email protected] wrote:
From what you are saying it sounds like it is simplified version of
1588? Something that is part of the ethernet rather than applied at
the physical layer. It also sounds like there is an NDA in place...
*From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
*Sent:* Saturday, June 17, 2017 11:25 AM
*To:* af
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
Did't need to...
On Jun 17, 2017 12:22 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
Have you done any reverse engineering on it yet?
*From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
*Sent:* Saturday, June 17, 2017 10:57 AM
*To:* af
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Sync
Cambium sync uses a different method of injecting the sync pulse
which is more compatible with high power and gigabit data.
They aren't close to the same. I can't be more specific than that.
On Jun 17, 2017 11:50 AM, "Matt" <[email protected]> wrote:
So how does Canopy sync over power differ from Cambium sync?
