Yeah, I didn't think about that.

Steve Jones wrote:
One thing to remember about that att router, thats not likely the channel it will stay on. If they power cycle it it will do that auto and pick a new channel.

On Jul 28, 2017 9:16 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Oh no that's definitely the case...


    Josh Luthman
    Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2340>
    Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2343>
    1100 Wayne St
    Suite 1337
    Troy, OH 45373

    On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Jay Weekley
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        No. There is a nearby ATT router that is being picked up by
        one of our APS and causing interference.  At least that's my
        theory.



        Josh Luthman wrote:
        Are you saying one of the three sectors is actually a
        wireless router?


        Josh Luthman
        Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2340>
        Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2343>
        1100 Wayne St
        Suite 1337
        Troy, OH 45373

        On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Jay Weekley
        <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            It's actually for an existing sector.  There is a nearby
            wireless router that is out of our control that is on the
            same channel as the AP in question.

            George Skorup wrote:

                Run a frame calculator. 20 vs 10 vs 5MHz with the
                same settings do not line up. In the ePMP world, I
                think the only thing you can do is mess with the max
                range a bit since all you get is 30/70, 50/50 and
                75/25 TDD ratios. And obviously you need to be on the
                same frame duration. If you're running the 20MHz
                sectors at 2.5ms for timing with PMP100, then another
                sector on 5MHz/5ms isn't gonna play nice.

                I really pisses me off that I can't do 2.5ms framing
                on 5 and 10MHz.

                On 7/28/2017 1:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

                    I don't think channel size changes the rules of
                    sync - you need a 5 MHz guard band, time them,
                    face different directions.

                    If the three APs are each on 120* you should have
                    no problem, though I don't believe any of the
                    sectors have good enough ftb to frequency refuse
                    (assuming the 5 MHz is the same space as 20 MHz).

                    If the three APs are using different frequency
                    space with a 5 MHz guard band you're fine.


                    Josh Luthman
                    Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
                    Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
                    1100 Wayne St
                    Suite 1337
                    Troy, OH 45373

                    On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Jay Weekley
                    <[email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>
                    <mailto:[email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

                        Are there any sync problems associated with
                    running APs with
                        different channel widths with EPMP?  For
                    example, if I have a
                        tower with 3 access points and 2 are set for
                    20 MHz wide channels
                        and one is set for a 5 MHZ wide channel will
                    that cause problems?




                
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient
                
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>>
                  Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
                
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient
                
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>>


                <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>




        
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
                Virus-free. www.avg.com
        
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>


        
<#m_5968073062938460201_m_7188115016625119220_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>




Reply via email to