So far, I have not encountered a problem caused by unterminated lines.  I think 
it is due to the fact that it is frequency division duplex and the transmit 
reflections not only have to experience splitter loss on the return trip but 
there are no receivers looking for energy in that direction.  

From: Mark Radabaugh 
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 7:21 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PLC Splitters

I have use the ‘bare’ FS PLC splitters before.   I can’t recall if the pigtails 
had color or were just numbered but they are coated and strip off exactly the 
same as the regular 250um acrylic coating.   For what it’s worth they fit 
nicely into a Tyco A or B size splice tray.   we direct spliced one into a case 
and terminated all 32 outputs onto the distribution cable.   

I don’t know that I would do that again simple because it creates a lot of 
drops with no control over the reflection at the far end until you connect 
those strands to customer houses or another termination panel.   So far it has 
not created any operation issues but to some extent I think we just got lucky.

Mark

  On Aug 10, 2017, at 11:09 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

  When you strip it, it sure looks bare.  All the color is gone.  
  After you strip it, you wipe it off with an alcohol wipe.  
  And then when you see it in the fusion splicer screen, it looks bare there 
too.  
  Actually it probably has to be totally bare or the coating would contaminate 
the burn.  

  From: Adam Moffett
  Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 8:24 PM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PLC Splitters

  If the glass was truly "bare" it would be 125um and also be too fragile to 
handle.  What is referred to as "bare fiber" actually has the 250um acrylic 
coating, probably with color added.  It's the barest the fiber can be while 
still being workable. 


  ------ Original Message ------
  From: "Jason McKemie" <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>
  To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
  Sent: 8/10/2017 6:24:08 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PLC Splitters

    That must be it, the "bare fiber" description is a bit misleading in that 
case though.  Strange way to specify the diameter.

    On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:

      A "bare fiber" pigtail has 250um acrylic coating.


      ------ Original Message ------
      From: ch...@wbmfg.com
      To: af@afmug.com
      Sent: 8/10/2017 6:07:52 PM
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PLC Splitters

        That sounds strange to me.  

        Is there such a thing as PON on multi mode fiber?

        From: Jason McKemie
        Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 3:37 PM
        To: af@afmug.com
        Subject: [AFMUG] PLC Splitters

        I'm looking to possibly do a trial GPON deployment on a leg of my 
active network, it looks like the FS.com PLC Splitters are 250µm.  However, 
singlemode fiber is usually spec'd at a cladding of 125µm.  Are they just using 
a different measurement or some sort of oddly sized fiber? 


        -Jason

Reply via email to