Suggestion.. Look at the Users guide from ubnt.com website for the AF11X. AF11x can work on a number of configurations.. Channels width of 5mhz to 56(80mhz)mhz SISO horizontal or vertical only channels MIMO both polarities (horizontal + Vertical), this configuration needs the additional diplexer. ( any combination of above ! ).
Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 6:12:44 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF-11x > Yeah, not too worried about the dupler/diplexer cost. If licensing is the > same, > why not. > From: Jon Langeler > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 4:11 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF-11x > I like using both polarities to maximize Rx sensitivity. Coordination is the > same cost. Duplexers are also not that much more. > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Aug 15, 2017, at 5:59 PM, Mathew Howard < mhoward...@gmail.com > wrote: >> Max channel bandwidth is 56mhz, but you should easily be able to get 250Mbps >> out >> of a 40mhz channel... I'm not sure there's much point in going in narrower >> than >> that. Actually, doing SISO at a 56mhz channel might make more sense, that >> should get around 275mbps at 256qam (and a bit more if the link will do >> 1024qam, obviously), but then you'd only need a one polarity, so it may save >> a >> bit on coordination, and you wouldn't need to buy the extra duplexers. >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Chuck McCown < ch...@wbmfg.com > wrote: >>> What is a common channel BW? 40 MHz? I suppose it depends on congestion. I >>> only >>> need about 250 Mbps so lower order modulation may be desirable and perhaps >>> narrower channels too. >>> From: Jeremy >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 10:54 AM >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF-11x >>> Of course, the exact configuration is based on your license and which >>> frequencies it is supposed to operate on. The above configuration is just an >>> example. >>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Jeremy < jeremysmi...@gmail.com > wrote: >>>> They are like that, but 3x bigger. On top, the lid comes off and the >>>> duplexers >>>> go beneath the cover. If your link is 'High' then you will want 'High' >>>> duplexers for both sides of the link (x4 total - two extra to purchase) - >>>> they >>>> will go in a configuration like 1-3-3-1 on one side and 3-1-1-3 on the >>>> other >>>> side. >>>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Mathew Howard < mhoward...@gmail.com > >>>> wrote: >>>>> They come with 1 duplexer (setup for SISO) - you need to buy the second >>>>> one >>>>> separately to do MIMO. You do need to figure out what frequencies you're >>>>> going >>>>> to be using before you buy the radios, since there are two different >>>>> duplexers, >>>>> depending on which half of the band you're in. >>>>> You need one frequency pair on both polarities (for MIMO). >>>>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Chuck McCown < ch...@wbmfg.com > wrote: >>>>>> Do they all come with two N connectors or do you have to pay more for >>>>>> duplexers? >>>>>> Not quite sure how to buy or license. I guess you have to have two pairs >>>>>> of >>>>>> frequencies? Or at the very least, both polarizations on the same >>>>>> frequency? >>>>>> Trying to collect some budgetary estimates on what my project is going >>>>>> to cost.
