They are upconverted 5ghz chipsets, but I don't know that I'd call it ubntesque. If 5ghz was interfering, I would assume it would show up on the spectrum analyzer, and it doesn't (although the first radios that we got replaced did show abnormally high noise floors... so it wouldn't surprise me if that was 5ghz leaking in)... but being upconverted chips, I can't help but wonder.
I don't think it's too hot, because our other link is at somewhere around -41,and it's running at higher modulation. I think I do have the tx power set a little lower on the other link though, so I guess that could be making a difference. I wouldn't call these radios junk, but they're no SAF. On Aug 17, 2017 8:34 PM, "Brett A Mansfield" <[email protected]> wrote: I'm with Steve. I just bought a couple B11s and they are going on a tower that has so much 5GHz that is very loud. If 5GHz interferes with it then I'm screwed. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On Aug 17, 2017, at 7:27 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote: So, there is potential for interference from 5g? If this is a garbage chip like that i dont want this gear. I wasnt behind the purchase, i want saf, i like saf, saf support is awesome, everyone in the saf sales channel has been awesome, even the saf guy who doesnt work for them. I got into junk gear im going to regret, didnt i? On Aug 17, 2017 7:23 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> wrote: > Ha..not same animal...B11 uses same chip sets as 5GHz radios I am told and > up converted. It offers user a lower cost option. You pay what you get > for.. > > Jaime Solorza > > On Aug 17, 2017 10:14 AM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I could give a crap about a snazzy GUI, and would much rather have a >> device that could run full modulation and full duplex. Prior to >> "experiencing" a B11, I'd never used a license radio that could not >> modulate at the full modulation. >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> >> On 8/17/2017 9:08 AM, Rory Conaway wrote: >> >> Steve, the interface is far more functional and simpler than most of the >> other licensed links. I can’t even get real-time bandwidth numbers out of >> them in the GUI’s which is kind of pathetic. The B11 and the Cloud are >> far more useful. >> >> >> >> Rory >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:53 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Figuring out what our FCC application says >> >> >> >> So we have completed the PCN on a couple mimosa B11 links (so very, very >> unimpressed with these radios interface and function) We went through >> comsearch. Trying to configure this, Im not sure what channel settings to >> put in. I went to the application, I see the centers, but no size. Is there >> a code on here that tells me what channel size we are applying for? >> >> >> >> And I notice the Application says the radio does not have ATPC, I thought >> these did, maybe im wrong >> >> >>
