I am not calling Mimosa B11 equipment junk by any means. It fits a need...it's an affordable solution which offers protection from interference with license and legal recourse...big plus...in my other life, I was sent prototype radios to test in this area which is noisy due to proximity to Mexican border (2 million folks) of Cd. Juarez, Fort Bliss , Biggs, and utilities compounded by noise from 7 WISPs. Some of the up converted radios heard other radios in 2.4GHz and it affected converted signal like 902-928Mhz. Spectrum Analyzer showed it clearly...some of these became viable products with internal shielding, others did not. I appreciate Mimosa ,Cambium, Ignite and Ubiquiti efforts and innovation. Hell , 512k ptp radios were the cat's pajamas when I started in this discipline...
Jaime Solorza On Aug 17, 2017 8:16 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: “I’m with Steve” Hmmm, do I have enough courage to hang with Steve??? Hangover part 4? *From:* Brett A Mansfield *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 7:33 PM *To:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Figuring out what our FCC application says I'm with Steve. I just bought a couple B11s and they are going on a tower that has so much 5GHz that is very loud. If 5GHz interferes with it then I'm screwed. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On Aug 17, 2017, at 7:27 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote: So, there is potential for interference from 5g? If this is a garbage chip like that i dont want this gear. I wasnt behind the purchase, i want saf, i like saf, saf support is awesome, everyone in the saf sales channel has been awesome, even the saf guy who doesnt work for them. I got into junk gear im going to regret, didnt i? On Aug 17, 2017 7:23 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> wrote: > Ha..not same animal...B11 uses same chip sets as 5GHz radios I am told and > up converted. It offers user a lower cost option. You pay what you get > for.. > > Jaime Solorza > > On Aug 17, 2017 10:14 AM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I could give a crap about a snazzy GUI, and would much rather have a >> device that could run full modulation and full duplex. Prior to >> "experiencing" a B11, I'd never used a license radio that could not >> modulate at the full modulation. >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> >> On 8/17/2017 9:08 AM, Rory Conaway wrote: >> >> Steve, the interface is far more functional and simpler than most of the >> other licensed links. I can’t even get real-time bandwidth numbers out of >> them in the GUI’s which is kind of pathetic. The B11 and the Cloud are >> far more useful. >> >> >> >> Rory >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:53 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Figuring out what our FCC application says >> >> >> >> So we have completed the PCN on a couple mimosa B11 links (so very, very >> unimpressed with these radios interface and function) We went through >> comsearch. Trying to configure this, Im not sure what channel settings to >> put in. I went to the application, I see the centers, but no size. Is there >> a code on here that tells me what channel size we are applying for? >> >> >> >> And I notice the Application says the radio does not have ATPC, I thought >> these did, maybe im wrong >> >> >>
