There is cooperation between FCC and SCT on licensed stuff like 2 way, cellular and licensed but Rio Grande not effective at blocking signals...in the 90s , the Chihuahua Cattle rancher association 800MHz system started interfering with local police..last about a week. Stranger things have to happen..more later.
Jaime Solorza On Aug 17, 2017 10:52 PM, "Steve Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: > Completely off the mimosa topic. > I'm in middle America, home of the permit, I have to have a permission > slip to even have a gun. So my 11ghz license is pretty protected. Down on > the southern border, I assume you still have to get FCC approval, but is > there anything other than TOW missile to rectify interference from the > south if you put up a licensed link?? > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> I am not calling Mimosa B11 equipment junk by any means. It fits a >> need...it's an affordable solution which offers protection from >> interference with license and legal recourse...big plus...in my other life, >> I was sent prototype radios to test in this area which is noisy due to >> proximity to Mexican border (2 million folks) of Cd. Juarez, Fort Bliss , >> Biggs, and utilities compounded by noise from 7 WISPs. Some of the up >> converted radios heard other radios in 2.4GHz and it affected converted >> signal like 902-928Mhz. Spectrum Analyzer showed it clearly...some of >> these became viable products with internal shielding, others did not. I >> appreciate Mimosa ,Cambium, Ignite and Ubiquiti efforts and innovation. >> Hell , 512k ptp radios were the cat's pajamas when I started in this >> discipline... >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> On Aug 17, 2017 8:16 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> “I’m with Steve” Hmmm, do I have enough courage to hang with Steve??? >> Hangover part 4? >> >> *From:* Brett A Mansfield >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 7:33 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Figuring out what our FCC application says >> >> I'm with Steve. I just bought a couple B11s and they are going on a tower >> that has so much 5GHz that is very loud. If 5GHz interferes with it then >> I'm screwed. >> >> Thank you, >> Brett A Mansfield >> >> On Aug 17, 2017, at 7:27 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> So, there is potential for interference from 5g? If this is a garbage >> chip like that i dont want this gear. I wasnt behind the purchase, i want >> saf, i like saf, saf support is awesome, everyone in the saf sales channel >> has been awesome, even the saf guy who doesnt work for them. >> >> I got into junk gear im going to regret, didnt i? >> >> On Aug 17, 2017 7:23 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Ha..not same animal...B11 uses same chip sets as 5GHz radios I am told >>> and up converted. It offers user a lower cost option. You pay what you >>> get for.. >>> >>> Jaime Solorza >>> >>> On Aug 17, 2017 10:14 AM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I could give a crap about a snazzy GUI, and would much rather have a >>>> device that could run full modulation and full duplex. Prior to >>>> "experiencing" a B11, I'd never used a license radio that could not >>>> modulate at the full modulation. >>>> >>>> bp >>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 8/17/2017 9:08 AM, Rory Conaway wrote: >>>> >>>> Steve, the interface is far more functional and simpler than most of >>>> the other licensed links. I can’t even get real-time bandwidth numbers out >>>> of them in the GUI’s which is kind of pathetic. The B11 and the Cloud are >>>> far more useful. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Rory >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:53 AM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Figuring out what our FCC application says >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So we have completed the PCN on a couple mimosa B11 links (so very, >>>> very unimpressed with these radios interface and function) We went through >>>> comsearch. Trying to configure this, Im not sure what channel settings to >>>> put in. I went to the application, I see the centers, but no size. Is there >>>> a code on here that tells me what channel size we are applying for? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> And I notice the Application says the radio does not have ATPC, I >>>> thought these did, maybe im wrong >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >
