You could look at it as holding a homestead during a land grab.

Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
[email protected]

> On Aug 25, 2017, at 6:31 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> So in order to operate an AF11X at its maximum channel width of 56mhz you 
> would have to register a path for 80mhz license is that true? So basically 
> your wasting some spectrum right? So could you have dual 40mhz  AF11X links 
> on the same path operating in your licensed 80mhz of spectrum that way your 
> not wasting any spectrum? Will that or can that even work?
> 
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Hardy, Tim <[email protected]> wrote:
>> As of today, no US paths have been coordinated or applied for with these 
>> radios.  
>> From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of SmarterBroadband <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 5:43:08 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences
>>  
>> Any members using Cablefree Licensed Links?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen Patrick
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:31 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Apologies I've only just seen this post,
>> 
>> A small input from CableFree. Aware we are a vendor so only leaving a short 
>> post.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The CableFree FOR3 product line is popular with ISPs in some countries.
>> 
>> Available in many bands including 11GHz (and other bands 5-26GHz, including 
>> 24 UL, if interested)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> www.cablefree.net/for3
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Up to 880Mbps full duplex using 1024QAM, single polarisation, and 112MHz 
>> spectrum.
>> 
>> You can of course set the radio to narrower channels, for example 440Mbps 
>> full duplex in 56MHz.
>> 
>> This is a "telecom design" FDD radio with separate transmit/receive 
>> channels, so you get symmetric links up/down and low latency.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Comments & questions welcome -
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Stephen
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On 31 May 2017 at 16:58, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> How many usable 11ghz channels are there? I looked on the Mimosa cloud map 
>> and only one other 11ghz registered link in my area and it doesn't appear to 
>> be in path with any of my towers.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Dennis Burgess <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Yep, called links J  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
>> 
>> MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
>> 
>> Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
>> 
>> Office: 314-735-0270
>> 
>> E-Mail: [email protected]
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of SmarterBroadband
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 10:09 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> We are on TowerCoverage.  I did not know it did path calcs.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis Burgess
>> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 9:56 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Towercoverage.com has done 11ghz for years J 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hardy, Tim
>> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:04 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Found this on ubnt forum - can't comment on accuracy.  FYI, we use PathLoss.
>> 
>> https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber/New-AF11FX-Link-Calculator/m-p/1741139#M32848
>> 
>> From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of SmarterBroadband <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 8:17:46 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Well I suppose I could, but hell I don’t want to.. 😊
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 2:22 PM
>> To: af <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I think they have that stuff in airlink, but you can always just look up the 
>> spec sheets for all the relevant parts and calculate it manually.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:18 PM, SmarterBroadband <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I can use Link Planner to check LOS.  But the 820 in Link Planner will have 
>> very different radio Tx powers and receive sensitivities.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 1:07 PM
>> To: af <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I think airlink,ubnt.com supports 11ghz now, so that can be used to get a 
>> fairly good idea of what it's going to do... also, Mimosa's tool is pretty 
>> nice.
>> 
>> But when you know you have a clear path and what the distance is, it's not 
>> very hard to calculate what the link is going to do... frequency planning is 
>> done by your coordinator.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:59 PM, SmarterBroadband <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Using?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 12:55 PM
>> To: af <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> DIY
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:45 PM, SmarterBroadband <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> How are you Link Planning your AF11 links?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Does UBNT do link Planning?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Reseller?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> DIY?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Other??
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 5:43 PM
>> To: af <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> We have one up... other than some very ugly issues right after we put it up 
>> (which was apparently a bug in the firmware they shipped with... upgrading 
>> to the latest beta firmware fixed it), it has been working perfectly, and I 
>> haven't touched it since.
>> 
>> The AF11 is certainly worth a look in my opinion, but it all depends on what 
>> you need it to do.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Jon Langeler <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Ignoring a few software bugs and delayed fixes, it's good for '2nd string' 
>> links. If this is for high priority link, I'd try SIAE or Cambium. 
>> 
>> Jon Langeler
>> 
>> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> On May 25, 2017, at 2:46 PM, SmarterBroadband <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> We are looking to add some more Licensed Links to our network.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Does anyone actually have the AF11 in service.  Is it worth a look?  How is 
>> it performing for you?  Any issues?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Just not sure if it is worth considering or should I be looking at existing 
>> companied like;
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Exalt ?
>> 
>> Dragonwave ?
>> 
>> SAIE ?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Or newer ones like
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Alcoma
>> 
>> Cablefree FOR3
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Anyone tried the last two?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Just looking for best bang for the buck in non core ring usage.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
> 

Reply via email to