Only if overlapping. I've largely ended 2.4ghz use in my home.

On Aug 28, 2017 1:09 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

> Dedicated APs cause more interference. :-)
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, August 28, 2017 1:09:07 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AP for VoIP
>
> I was leaning to having a dedicated AP for the phones. I would think that
> would help but still not ideal. If it goes that way I'll give you a shout.
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:31 PM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
> wrote:
>
>> If you decide to do this, shoot me an email. I'm happy to offer some
>> tips as to how to make this work best on UniFi. Like I said, I *do*
>> run it at home, but no wireless VOIP solution is without it's hiccups.
>> It depends a lot on the demands put on the wireless network, the
>> environment, usage patterns, etc.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Yea, even when you tell people "I don't recommend this, you likely
>> won't be
>> > happy. But you are an adult and can make your own decisions." They come
>> back
>> > in 3 weeks whining about how bad whatever it was is and how you
>> promised it
>> > would work. If they do happen to remember it they are still mad at you
>> since
>> > "you told them so" and of course, nobody can be mad at themselves.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:32 AM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Don't.
>> >>
>> >> It'll work, then it won't. Then it will, then it won't.
>> >>
>> >> I guess it depends on how important this is to your reputation vs cost.
>> >>
>> >> On Aug 28, 2017 10:53 AM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Yea, that is my initial thought as well. I am hoping by
>> >>>
>> >>> being inside
>> >>> being very close to the AP
>> >>> being lucky?
>> >>>
>> >>> I might be able to make this work.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:45 AM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> There is no license with anything Ubiquiti other than their licensed
>> >>>> radio offerings, and even that isn't through them.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I do run several VoIP endpoints in my home. Some wired, some
>> wireless.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I would never recommend wireless to feed VoIP unless there was no
>> other
>> >>>> option. It doesn't matter if you vlan, have proper dscp, etc - the
>> problem
>> >>>> is the nature of the media and it's suceptability to interference and
>> >>>> distortion.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> A sip dect handset to a wired basestation is another animal all
>> >>>> together.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Aug 28, 2017 10:10 AM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I am installing a VoIP system in an old building. It had CAT5 run at
>> >>>> some point with pretty crappy cable. Out of 29 cables on a punch
>> down I
>> >>>> could only locate 5 jacks that toned, out of those only 1 passed. By
>> the
>> >>>> length it is likely that those other 4 just need a few inches cut and
>> >>>> re-terminated.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Anyway, Only one of those is in the right place. I was considering
>> >>>> installing an AP to connect the VoIP phones to and if the AP
>> supported VLAN,
>> >>>> DSCP and QOS, maybe let them use it for everything else as well.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I looked at the Ubiquiti UAP-AC-LITE-US which says it has WMM for
>> voice
>> >>>> and 802.1x. I was also looking at the Xclaim Xi-1 which is a Rukus
>> entry
>> >>>> level. I trust the Rukus name more but the UAP is faster and appears
>> to have
>> >>>> all the features. Rukus comes with free cloud management and it
>> looks like
>> >>>> Ubiquiti is a license.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Anyone have experience with VoIP on WiFi with any of the above gear?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to