I guess I have been lucky...have always figured a way to overcome interference issues with out involving offender or anyone else.
Jaime Solorza On Aug 30, 2017 10:48 AM, "Steve Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: > remediation terms wouldn't be a bad thing to have. ie "if some MFer > collocates, tenant is absolved of all liability for .40 remediation of all > offending equipment" > > and as I recently found out, make sure the property is clearly defined, if > there are multiple structures on the property, make sure theyre included, > and don't assume just because a facility is all in one location that there > is only a single address. Maybe define the address as the plat ID(s) > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> DC to cosmic rays would be a bit more inclusive >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Seth Mattinen >> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:12 AM >> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] contract verbage for site lease that covers all >> thebands >> >> On 8/30/17 06:18, Chuck McCown wrote: >> >>> lessor grants exclusive use of (frequency ranges) >>> >> >> 1MHz to 1THz >> > >
