Well, right now I'm in an all day meeting with a vendor about a federal product rollout.
You guess how that's going. On Aug 30, 2017 12:26 PM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> wrote: LOL. Josh, I wonder what it would be like to live in your world. Rory *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:12 AM *To:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] contract verbage for site lease that covers all thebands Just pee on it. Assert your dominance. On Aug 30, 2017 12:10 PM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> wrote: I suspect some others are going to want this spot when they find out about it. Just making sure it’s not an issue. *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:03 AM *To:* Animal Farm *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] contract verbage for site lease that covers all thebands I guess I have been lucky...have always figured a way to overcome interference issues with out involving offender or anyone else. Jaime Solorza On Aug 30, 2017 10:48 AM, "Steve Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: remediation terms wouldn't be a bad thing to have. ie "if some MFer collocates, tenant is absolved of all liability for .40 remediation of all offending equipment" and as I recently found out, make sure the property is clearly defined, if there are multiple structures on the property, make sure theyre included, and don't assume just because a facility is all in one location that there is only a single address. Maybe define the address as the plat ID(s) On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: DC to cosmic rays would be a bit more inclusive -----Original Message----- From: Seth Mattinen Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] contract verbage for site lease that covers all thebands On 8/30/17 06:18, Chuck McCown wrote: lessor grants exclusive use of (frequency ranges) 1MHz to 1THz
