Yeah, that makes sense. I think Ignitenet is excellent price and quality wise when talking PTP. It’s PTMP that it is cost prohibitive I think.
Thank you, Brett A Mansfield > On Sep 11, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Because IgniteNet is way cheaper than Siklu, which is way cheaper than > everything else. There's links going for over $10k and IgniteNet is 1/10th of > that. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > > From: "Brett A Mansfield" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 5:55:42 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz > > I’m not sure why that is funny. The average CPE cost is much less than the > Ignitenet radios. I’m not running fiber, which is also cost prohibitive > without deep pockets. A good ROI for a WISP is 6-12 months. For fiber it’s > 5-6 years. The reason being you’ll get many more service calls with wireless, > as well as less consistent speeds. Fiber is solid and you don’t have to > replace as many electronics as often. So I’m not sure why you laugh when I > say Ignitenet is cost prohibitive. > > Thank you, > Brett A Mansfield > > > On Sep 11, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Chris Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Ignitenet is cost prohibitive? LOL > > > > Chris Wright > > Network Administrator > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield > > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 3:24 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [AFMUG] 60GHz > > > > Anyone know anything about the Mikrotik 60GHz stuff yet? I’m looking for > > some good gear and I use some Ignitenet. Ignitenet is great but so cost > > prohibitive. I’m hoping Mikrotik will have theirs released very soon as I > > need a couple hundred radios. > > > > Thank you, > > Brett A Mansfield > > >
