I don't think anyone has a higher CPE limit in 60 GHz. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Brett A Mansfield" <li...@silverlakeinternet.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 7:31:25 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz 

True, until you realize you can only put 8 or 16 customers on an AP. Their 
pricing isn’t terrible, and I’m going to be buying at least some Ignitenet for 
this project. I was just hoping for some less expensive stuff I can use for 
customers on the lower plans. 


Thank you, 
Brett A Mansfield 

On Sep 11, 2017, at 5:35 PM, Mathew Howard < mhoward...@gmail.com > wrote: 





It's certainly more expensive than most of us are used to with PTMP, but it's 
not really that bad... if you consider the cost of the APs, compared to 
something like PMP450 or LTE, it doesn't start to look so bad. 



On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Brett A Mansfield < 
li...@silverlakeinternet.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>

Yeah, that makes sense. I think Ignitenet is excellent price and quality wise 
when talking PTP. It’s PTMP that it is cost prohibitive I think. 


Thank you, 
Brett A Mansfield 



On Sep 11, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: 


<blockquote>


Because IgniteNet is way cheaper than Siklu, which is way cheaper than 
everything else. There's links going for over $10k and IgniteNet is 1/10th of 
that. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 






From: "Brett A Mansfield" < li...@silverlakeinternet.com > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 5:55:42 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60GHz 

I’m not sure why that is funny. The average CPE cost is much less than the 
Ignitenet radios. I’m not running fiber, which is also cost prohibitive without 
deep pockets. A good ROI for a WISP is 6-12 months. For fiber it’s 5-6 years. 
The reason being you’ll get many more service calls with wireless, as well as 
less consistent speeds. Fiber is solid and you don’t have to replace as many 
electronics as often. So I’m not sure why you laugh when I say Ignitenet is 
cost prohibitive. 

Thank you, 
Brett A Mansfield 

> On Sep 11, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Chris Wright < ch...@velociter.net > wrote: 
> 
> Ignitenet is cost prohibitive? LOL 
> 
> Chris Wright 
> Network Administrator 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield 
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 3:24 PM 
> To: af@afmug.com 
> Subject: [AFMUG] 60GHz 
> 
> Anyone know anything about the Mikrotik 60GHz stuff yet? I’m looking for some 
> good gear and I use some Ignitenet. Ignitenet is great but so cost 
> prohibitive. I’m hoping Mikrotik will have theirs released very soon as I 
> need a couple hundred radios. 
> 
> Thank you, 
> Brett A Mansfield 
> 




</blockquote>


</blockquote>

Reply via email to