he needs to locate a license first. the "protections" offered zero protections when it was active
it will offer the same "protections" after. When CBRS is in play, the "grandfathered" locations (excluding installs after the deadline) will have "protection" from the first type licesnse, of equal value, ie none, and the other two trump it. As I understand it On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > Registering SM/CPE locations has always been required, and still is > (essentially, nothing has changed at this point). There is an excepts for > lower powered mobile devices, but it's unlikely that anything a WISP would > be using would ever fall into that category. > > Yes, CBRS is going to change all of that, but that's still a ways off. > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Brandon Shiers < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> All, >> >> >> >> I have a client that’s looking at putting some 3.65Ghz gear into their >> network for some PTMP coverage. >> >> >> >> As it sits now, are operators required to register all SM locations or >> not? I can’t seem to find anything clear on this. I know for sites >> operating prior to 2015, there was a provision for protection for >> unregistered CPE’s however this would be a brand new build. I also know >> the proposed rules are still being hashed out, so what’s the letter of the >> law as it sits now, and does the new CBRS stuff change that at all? >> >> >> >> >> >> *Brandon Shiers, RF Engineer In Training* >> >> >> >> 937 West Main Street >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=937+West+Main+Street+%0D+Riverton,+WY+82501&entry=gmail&source=g> >> Riverton, WY 82501 >> >> >> >> 307.857.6704 <(307)%20857-6704> (o) >> 307.840.2366 <(307)%20840-2366> (c) >> 307.856.1499 <(307)%20856-1499> (f) >> [email protected] <[email protected]> >> >> [image: http://www.cerento.com/emailsignatures/logo.jpg] >> >> >> >> >> > >
