Binary sucks. I never use it.

I know I've used 2.6.2.1 JSON config files on 3.2.2, 3.3, 3.4.1 and 3.5. The only real problem I can recall right now is user accounts that are disabled. Take those out of the config file and it works fine. My latest sets our generic SM password for all four users. Works for me.

3.4.1 has been fine as far as I can tell. I have very few radios running 3.5, but seems fine for the most part.

Some issues with 3.5 that have been noted on the Cambium Community are minor annoyances. When I upgrade a radio to 3.5, I have to completely shut down my browser before it will let me log back in. Ctrl+Shift+R doesn't work. Something probably changed in CSS or some shit and Chrome won't let it go. People complain this still doesn't work. It does. They're probably running Chrome and don't realize that background Chrome processes stay running, like the Hangouts desktop app. Kill it from task manager and everything works fine. Another which Cambium confirmed is GPS coordinates not saving or something like that.
Hopefully they'll get this small stuff fixed up in 3.5.1 or whatever's next.

On 9/25/2017 2:04 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Yeah, I've seen major problems re-using config files between certain versions, but I haven't noticed anything on the last few... but it might just be that I'm not using the stuff that's getting screwed up (like the cnmaestro stuff).

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I have seen the same thing Steve.



    Joe

    On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Steve Jones
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        we have found with config files, never, ever, under any
        circumstance load one from one firmware to another, ever,
        disease and pestulence always follow.

        its irritating because we load a default config into each unit
        before deployment, so each firmware we upgrade a bench unit,
        factory default it, manually rebuild the entire config and
        export it.

        cnmaestro onboarding and passwords are almost always jacked
        regardless

        On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Nate Burke
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            I haven't spent any time on the forums, or opened any
            tickets.   But the one thing I've noticed from my little
            usage of 3.4 and 3.5 revolves around saving config
            changes.  Click the save button, and radio will just to go
            'applying' for several seconds, may or may not actually
            come back from the 'applying' state.

            And loading in a backup config file requires the radio to
            power cycle to access the radio, it's like it locks the IP
            portion.

            I'm sticking with 2.6.2 for almost everything for now, and
            just dealing with the Slow GUI.

            On 9/25/2017 12:42 PM, Paul McCall wrote:

            What bugs have you actually experienced? It seems that
            others are not having major issues with 3.5.  a few
            things as mentioned on Cambium forums.

            Paul

            *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
            *Josh Luthman
            *Sent:* Sunday, September 24, 2017 10:58 AM
            *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 3.5

            Rolling 3.2.2 still.  I've got known issues in 3.4 and
            3.5 that doesn't make it worth it.

            I would really like to have my downlink% OID that came
            with 3.3 or 3.4...but not at the cost of the bugs.


            Josh Luthman
            Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2340>
            Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2343>
            1100 Wayne St
            
<https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D+Suite+1337+%0D+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
            Suite 1337
            Troy, OH 45373

            On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Mathew Howard
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                I guess I over estimated a bit, looks like we've only
                got a hundred or so on 3.5. I think we have somewhere
                around a thousand customers on ePMP.

                On Sep 23, 2017 1:14 PM, "Paul McCall"
                <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                    How big is your network?

                    *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of
                    *Mathew Howard
                    *Sent:* Saturday, September 23, 2017 10:38 AM
                    *To:* af <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
                    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 3.5

                    I've got 3.5 running on probably about half our
                    stuff now. I haven't noticed any major issues.

                    On Sep 23, 2017 8:15 AM, "Paul McCall"
                    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                        I see a few problems on the Cambium form on
                        3.5. They may be isolated incidences but
                        enough to have caution. Has anybody rolled it
                        out to a large number of APs and SMs?

                        Paul McCall, President

                        PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.

                        658 Old Dixie Highway
                        
<https://maps.google.com/?q=658+Old+Dixie+Highway%0D+Vero+Beach,+FL+32962%0D+772&entry=gmail&source=g>

                        Vero Beach, FL 32962
                        
<https://maps.google.com/?q=658+Old+Dixie+Highway%0D+Vero+Beach,+FL+32962%0D+772&entry=gmail&source=g>

                        772-564-6800 <tel:%28772%29%20564-6800>

                        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

                        www.pdmnet.com <http://www.pdmnet.com>

                        www.floridabroadband.com
                        <http://www.floridabroadband.com>






Reply via email to