ITs a big deal for me. Im a window warrior, half the time I have 2 or 3
windows open each with a billion tabs. I hate when Im troubleshooting and
upgrade a firmware and have to close out all those youporn tab....... Work
related tabs

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, I stopped using binary config files a long time ago. I think I've
> been using the same config file for SMs since 3.2.2, and I haven't seen any
> issues with it. There was a change at one point that caused the old config
> files to completely fail, but that might've been when I was still using
> binary.
>
> I'm pretty sure the browser not being able to login thing goes back to
> 3.4.1, it's annoying, but it's really not that big of a deal...
> interestingly, if you go from something really old, like 2.4.5, it doesn't
> happen.
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:33 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Binary sucks. I never use it.
>>
>> I know I've used 2.6.2.1 JSON config files on 3.2.2, 3.3, 3.4.1 and 3.5.
>> The only real problem I can recall right now is user accounts that are
>> disabled. Take those out of the config file and it works fine. My latest
>> sets our generic SM password for all four users. Works for me.
>>
>> 3.4.1 has been fine as far as I can tell. I have very few radios running
>> 3.5, but seems fine for the most part.
>>
>> Some issues with 3.5 that have been noted on the Cambium Community are
>> minor annoyances.
>> When I upgrade a radio to 3.5, I have to completely shut down my browser
>> before it will let me log back in. Ctrl+Shift+R doesn't work. Something
>> probably changed in CSS or some shit and Chrome won't let it go. People
>> complain this still doesn't work. It does. They're probably running Chrome
>> and don't realize that background Chrome processes stay running, like the
>> Hangouts desktop app. Kill it from task manager and everything works fine.
>> Another which Cambium confirmed is GPS coordinates not saving or
>> something like that.
>> Hopefully they'll get this small stuff fixed up in 3.5.1 or whatever's
>> next.
>>
>> On 9/25/2017 2:04 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I've seen major problems re-using config files between certain
>> versions, but I haven't noticed anything on the last few... but it might
>> just be that I'm not using the stuff that's getting screwed up (like the
>> cnmaestro stuff).
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I have seen the same thing Steve.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> we have found with config files, never, ever, under any circumstance
>>>> load one from one firmware to another, ever, disease and pestulence always
>>>> follow.
>>>>
>>>> its irritating because we load a default config into each unit before
>>>> deployment, so each firmware we upgrade a bench unit, factory default it,
>>>> manually rebuild the entire config and export it.
>>>>
>>>> cnmaestro onboarding and passwords are almost always jacked regardless
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Nate Burke <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I haven't spent any time on the forums, or opened any tickets.   But
>>>>> the one thing I've noticed from my little usage of 3.4 and 3.5 revolves
>>>>> around saving config changes.  Click the save button, and radio will just
>>>>> to go 'applying' for several seconds, may or may not actually come back
>>>>> from the 'applying' state.
>>>>>
>>>>> And loading in a backup config file requires the radio to power cycle
>>>>> to access the radio, it's like it locks the IP portion.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sticking with 2.6.2 for almost everything for now, and just
>>>>> dealing with the Slow GUI.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/25/2017 12:42 PM, Paul McCall wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> What bugs have you actually experienced?  It seems that others are not
>>>>> having major issues with 3.5.  a few things as mentioned on Cambium 
>>>>> forums.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, September 24, 2017 10:58 AM
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 3.5
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rolling 3.2.2 still.  I've got known issues in 3.4 and 3.5 that
>>>>> doesn't make it worth it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would really like to have my downlink% OID that came with 3.3 or
>>>>> 3.4...but not at the cost of the bugs.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340>
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343>
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D+Suite+1337+%0D+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess I over estimated a bit, looks like we've only got a hundred or
>>>>> so on 3.5. I think we have somewhere around a thousand customers on ePMP.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 23, 2017 1:14 PM, "Paul McCall" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> How big is your network?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard
>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, September 23, 2017 10:38 AM
>>>>> *To:* af <[email protected]>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 3.5
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've got 3.5 running on probably about half our stuff now. I haven't
>>>>> noticed any major issues.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 23, 2017 8:15 AM, "Paul McCall" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I see a few problems on the Cambium form on 3.5.   They may be
>>>>> isolated incidences but enough to have caution. Has anybody rolled it out
>>>>> to a large number of APs and SMs?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul McCall, President
>>>>>
>>>>> PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> 658 Old Dixie Highway
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=658+Old+Dixie+Highway%0D+Vero+Beach,+FL+32962%0D+772&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>
>>>>> Vero Beach, FL 32962
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=658+Old+Dixie+Highway%0D+Vero+Beach,+FL+32962%0D+772&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>
>>>>> 772-564-6800 <%28772%29%20564-6800>
>>>>>
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> www.pdmnet.com
>>>>>
>>>>> www.floridabroadband.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to