yeah, mikrotik used to be an option when imagestream was an option On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Back? No. Never had Mikrotik. In ancient times it was CentOS, then > ImageStream, then their own. > > You'll still need a BMU of sorts for SNMP, monitoring, etc but the duties > of queues/routes/redirect/packet pushing are the bigger demands. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> > Suite 1337 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> > Troy, OH 45373 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> theyre going back to mikrotiks? >> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Mikrotik integrated is starting, I'd wait until that's done and avoid >>> buying an official "BMU". >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> Suite 1337 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at >>>> least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy >>>> off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. >>>> >>>> weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has >>>> increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm >>>> understanding the attacked MT correctly. >>>> >>>> This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring >>>> devices on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer >>>> latencies. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or >>>>>> so accounts or higher. >>>>>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) >>>>>> on your billing server. >>>>>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 >>>>>> customers i think. >>>>>> >>>>>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> *From:* Steve Jones <[email protected]> >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >>>>>> >>>>>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a >>>>>> bmu, but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary >>>>>> sites I >>>>>> don't seem to be able to find any specs >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Adair Winter >>>>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >>>>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071> >>>>> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180> >>>>> http://www.amarillowireless.net >>>>> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
