Years ago, when M900 first came out I used them to connect cameras at school district in places where we had no LAN drops. The water company had a line break and while digging to get at line they cut our fiber. This link provided phone, data and Internet to district office, elementary and maintenance department. I moved an M900 with dual yagis to district office and got us back on line for a day while fiber got fixed by contractor. I set them at 20MHz and connected at little over a hundred. Never had a chance to test what real speed was but phones worked and emails went in and out. Link was about 2 miles with few trees but not many in path. Those are still used for cameras but in 5MHz channels. Worth a try.
On Oct 3, 2017 4:49 PM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> wrote: > The Tanana products take Orthogon’s original technology to the next > level. Each link has 16 radios in them going in the same direction. It’s > great for high-interference and nlos with lots of multi-pathing. It isn’t > great for pure blockage like trees in which there is no mult-ipathing. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 03, 2017 10:14 AM > *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] What is the faster PTP LTE products out there for > 3.65GHz or 2.4GHz? > > > > Watched some of the Tarana Wireless videos. Reminds me of Orthogan videos > and that other company with 5GHz Nlos 800Mbps product that was around > 8500.00...i shared pictures and stuff From Tessco show ...two years ago > > > > On Oct 3, 2017 11:04 AM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not if it was built from scratch to be PTP. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 3, 2017 7:25 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] What is the faster PTP LTE products out there for > 3.65GHz or 2.4GHz? > > > > Complexities of the LTE stack, required components for operation, a design > around multi-client and not single endpoint performance, etc. > > > > On Oct 3, 2017 9:12 AM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don’t understand why LTE wouldn’t be “suited”. Assuming no noise, which > I have, the PHY Layer should be better. > > > > I’m trying to get at least 200Mbps and we are testing both a Prism AC2 and > an AirFiber 2x. 900MHz is last resort due to its bandwidth limitations but > it’s on the table depending on how this test goes. Budget is also not the > problem on this project, just performance. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Monday, October 2, 2017 7:44 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] What is the faster PTP LTE products out there for > 3.65GHz or 2.4GHz? > > > > Yeah... LTE isn't particularly well suited to PTP. I guess you could make > it work, but it's going to be a little messy. Baicells would probably be > the only realistic option, since you wouldn't want to be dealing with an > actual LTE core. If you want to try using 3.65ghz, airfiber is probably the > best option, but if there's a low noise floor, 2.4ghz is going to work > better. 900mhz could also be an option if noise isn't too bad. > > > > On Oct 2, 2017 9:37 PM, "Nathan Anderson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm confused by the use of "PtP" and "LTE" in the same sentence. > > > > -- Nathan > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway > *Sent:* Monday, October 02, 2017 7:27 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [AFMUG] What is the faster PTP LTE products out there for > 3.65GHz or 2.4GHz? > > > > I’ve got a remote link, 5 miles, with about ½ mile of trees. I’m going to > test 2.4GHz tomorrow but am interested in some of the LTE products that > might be out there. > > > > *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO* > > *4226 S. 37 <https://maps.google.com/?q=4226+S.+37&entry=gmail&source=g>th > Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040* > > *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>* > > *[email protected] <[email protected]>* > > *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>* > > > > *“It’s not the team with the best players that win, it’s the players with > the best team that wins!”* — Humphrey Bogart > > > > > >
