I need to find my Steve quotes file as that definitely belongs in there. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> You can masturbate, or you can screw a chicken. Just because you move the > chicken in your hand when you screw it doesn't mean you're masturbating. > In other words use equipment as it is intended. > > On Oct 3, 2017 9:25 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Complexities of the LTE stack, required components for operation, a >> design around multi-client and not single endpoint performance, etc. >> >> On Oct 3, 2017 9:12 AM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I don’t understand why LTE wouldn’t be “suited”. Assuming no noise, >>> which I have, the PHY Layer should be better. >>> >>> >>> >>> I’m trying to get at least 200Mbps and we are testing both a Prism AC2 >>> and an AirFiber 2x. 900MHz is last resort due to its bandwidth limitations >>> but it’s on the table depending on how this test goes. Budget is also not >>> the problem on this project, just performance. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rory >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard >>> *Sent:* Monday, October 2, 2017 7:44 PM >>> *To:* af >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] What is the faster PTP LTE products out there >>> for 3.65GHz or 2.4GHz? >>> >>> >>> >>> Yeah... LTE isn't particularly well suited to PTP. I guess you could >>> make it work, but it's going to be a little messy. Baicells would probably >>> be the only realistic option, since you wouldn't want to be dealing with an >>> actual LTE core. If you want to try using 3.65ghz, airfiber is probably the >>> best option, but if there's a low noise floor, 2.4ghz is going to work >>> better. 900mhz could also be an option if noise isn't too bad. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 2, 2017 9:37 PM, "Nathan Anderson" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'm confused by the use of "PtP" and "LTE" in the same sentence. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- Nathan >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway >>> *Sent:* Monday, October 02, 2017 7:27 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] What is the faster PTP LTE products out there for >>> 3.65GHz or 2.4GHz? >>> >>> >>> >>> I’ve got a remote link, 5 miles, with about ½ mile of trees. I’m going >>> to test 2.4GHz tomorrow but am interested in some of the LTE products that >>> might be out there. >>> >>> >>> >>> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO* >>> >>> *4226 S. 37 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=4226+S.+37&entry=gmail&source=g>th Street • >>> Phoenix • AZ 85040* >>> >>> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>* >>> >>> *[email protected] <[email protected]>* >>> >>> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>* >>> >>> >>> >>> *“It’s not the team with the best players that win, it’s the players >>> with the best team that wins!”* — Humphrey Bogart >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>
