As always. s/would/wolf/ On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 1:20 PM Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oh. Maybe you meant "wolf"? > > Keyboard issues Lewis? > > -bp > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What's a "would"? >> >> -bp >> >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> In a book I picked up, last time I was at Yellowstone, there is a >>> picture of a would following a grizzly. Maybe 30 yards behind. >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, 10:53 AM Jason McKemie < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Trophic Cascades - the Yellowstone example was pretty amazing. >>>> >>>> On Thursday, October 26, 2017, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> If you read about the affects of reintroducing wolves at Yellowstone, >>>>> the outcome was largely positive for the whole area. The area was >>>>> dominated by Elk. Wolves keep the elk under control and provide a >>>>> consistent supply of carrion for scavengers. Controlling the elk allowed >>>>> more trees and brush to grow, which is good for birds and beavers. More >>>>> beavers means more dams, which is good for fish, flood control, and >>>>> leveling out the seasonal changes in the water table. With wolves at the >>>>> top of the pile instead of elk, the whole system seems to be stronger. >>>>> >>>>> How do we get on these tangents though? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>>> From: "Caleb Knauer" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: 10/26/2017 8:20:40 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.5Ghz future >>>>> >>>>> And then when the wolf population gets too high, you have to introduce >>>>>> bears into the area. After that? Landsharks. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> If you kill one or more coyotes, when they take "call" at night, there >>>>>>> is suspicion that the lower number of calls can actually trigger the >>>>>>> females into having larger litters. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you want to reduce coyote populations you have to balance the >>>>>>> ecosystem by introducing wolves into the area... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Larry Smith <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>> Most likely take more than 3, but what coyotes do is >>>>>>>> work as a group. Several will chase the deer for a while, >>>>>>>> then the other group catches up and the first group rests. >>>>>>>> The deer gets no rest though and eventually they just wear >>>>>>>> it down. Once they can break a leg or get a good neck >>>>>>>> cut they just wait it out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> About the only thing I will waste a good deer hunt on >>>>>>>> is a coyote, shoot them every chance I get... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Larry Smith >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed October 25 2017 15:08, Bill Prince wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would think it would take more than 3 coyotes to nail a mule deer. >>>>>>>>> Although mule deer aren't particularly bright; they often run >>>>>>>>> "just over >>>>>>>>> the next rise", then stop because they can't see the danger >>>>>>>>> anymore. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> bp >>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2017 12:51 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > Speaking of hunting, I saw three coyotes chasing a good size mule >>>>>>>>> deer >>>>>>>>> > as I approached McKrittick canyon cutoff Monday about 7 am on my >>>>>>>>> way >>>>>>>>> > to Orla,Texas. Deer was way ahead of them. wonder if they >>>>>>>>> caught it.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> bp >> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com >> > > > > -- > -- > bp > part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com >
