Them's good eatin', I hear... On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote:
> All this talk about wolfs is making me hungry for some reason… > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman > *Sent:* Thursday, October 26, 2017 12:06 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 3.5Ghz future > > > > As always. s/would/wolf/ > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 1:20 PM Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh. Maybe you meant "wolf"? > > > > Keyboard issues Lewis? > > > > -bp > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > > What's a "would"? > > > > -bp > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > In a book I picked up, last time I was at Yellowstone, there is a picture > of a would following a grizzly. Maybe 30 yards behind. > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, 10:53 AM Jason McKemie < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Trophic Cascades - the Yellowstone example was pretty amazing. > > On Thursday, October 26, 2017, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you read about the affects of reintroducing wolves at Yellowstone, the > outcome was largely positive for the whole area. The area was dominated by > Elk. Wolves keep the elk under control and provide a consistent supply of > carrion for scavengers. Controlling the elk allowed more trees and brush > to grow, which is good for birds and beavers. More beavers means more > dams, which is good for fish, flood control, and leveling out the seasonal > changes in the water table. With wolves at the top of the pile instead of > elk, the whole system seems to be stronger. > > How do we get on these tangents though? > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Caleb Knauer" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: 10/26/2017 8:20:40 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.5Ghz future > > And then when the wolf population gets too high, you have to introduce > bears into the area. After that? Landsharks. > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > wrote: > > If you kill one or more coyotes, when they take "call" at night, there > is suspicion that the lower number of calls can actually trigger the > females into having larger litters. > > If you want to reduce coyote populations you have to balance the > ecosystem by introducing wolves into the area... > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Larry Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Most likely take more than 3, but what coyotes do is > work as a group. Several will chase the deer for a while, > then the other group catches up and the first group rests. > The deer gets no rest though and eventually they just wear > it down. Once they can break a leg or get a good neck > cut they just wait it out. > > About the only thing I will waste a good deer hunt on > is a coyote, shoot them every chance I get... > > -- > Larry Smith > [email protected] > > On Wed October 25 2017 15:08, Bill Prince wrote: > > I would think it would take more than 3 coyotes to nail a mule deer. > Although mule deer aren't particularly bright; they often run "just over > the next rise", then stop because they can't see the danger anymore. > > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 10/25/2017 12:51 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: > > > Speaking of hunting, I saw three coyotes chasing a good size mule deer > > as I approached McKrittick canyon cutoff Monday about 7 am on my way > > to Orla,Texas. Deer was way ahead of them. wonder if they caught it.. > > > > > > -- > > -- > > bp > > part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com > > > > > > -- > > -- > > bp > > part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com > >
