I’ll tell Duran, Duran. Rory
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 4:43 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.5Ghz future Them's good eatin', I hear... On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: All this talk about wolfs is making me hungry for some reason… Rory From: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 12:06 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.5Ghz future As always. s/would/wolf/ On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 1:20 PM Bill Prince <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Oh. Maybe you meant "wolf"? Keyboard issues Lewis? -bp On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Bill Prince <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: What's a "would"? -bp On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Lewis Bergman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: In a book I picked up, last time I was at Yellowstone, there is a picture of a would following a grizzly. Maybe 30 yards behind. On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, 10:53 AM Jason McKemie <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Trophic Cascades - the Yellowstone example was pretty amazing. On Thursday, October 26, 2017, Adam Moffett <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: If you read about the affects of reintroducing wolves at Yellowstone, the outcome was largely positive for the whole area. The area was dominated by Elk. Wolves keep the elk under control and provide a consistent supply of carrion for scavengers. Controlling the elk allowed more trees and brush to grow, which is good for birds and beavers. More beavers means more dams, which is good for fish, flood control, and leveling out the seasonal changes in the water table. With wolves at the top of the pile instead of elk, the whole system seems to be stronger. How do we get on these tangents though? ------ Original Message ------ From: "Caleb Knauer" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: 10/26/2017 8:20:40 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.5Ghz future And then when the wolf population gets too high, you have to introduce bears into the area. After that? Landsharks. On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: If you kill one or more coyotes, when they take "call" at night, there is suspicion that the lower number of calls can actually trigger the females into having larger litters. If you want to reduce coyote populations you have to balance the ecosystem by introducing wolves into the area... On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Larry Smith <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Most likely take more than 3, but what coyotes do is work as a group. Several will chase the deer for a while, then the other group catches up and the first group rests. The deer gets no rest though and eventually they just wear it down. Once they can break a leg or get a good neck cut they just wait it out. About the only thing I will waste a good deer hunt on is a coyote, shoot them every chance I get... -- Larry Smith [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> On Wed October 25 2017 15:08, Bill Prince wrote: I would think it would take more than 3 coyotes to nail a mule deer. Although mule deer aren't particularly bright; they often run "just over the next rise", then stop because they can't see the danger anymore. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 10/25/2017 12:51 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: > Speaking of hunting, I saw three coyotes chasing a good size mule deer > as I approached McKrittick canyon cutoff Monday about 7 am on my way > to Orla,Texas. Deer was way ahead of them. wonder if they caught it.. -- -- bp part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com -- -- bp part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
