Exactly. I literally see people suggesting that ISP's will charge for
access to Facebook or charge for access to Netflix. Not. Going. To.
Happen.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]>
To: "af" <[email protected]>
Sent: 12/15/2017 3:57:00 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Our NN statment
Yeah, true, there were ways to legally do it before if you really
wanted to. Bbut more to the point, nobody is going to do something like
that anyway, because there's no way that it would be worth the customer
backlash they'd have to deal with.
Nah, nobody is going to have the sense to feel silly about it...
they'll just keep whining for awhile, and then forget about it. Or
else, they'll find something that's completely unrelated that they
don't like and blame it on the lack of NN.
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
wrote:
You would have to justify that as "reasonable network management".
They defined reasonable network management as being driven by
technical reasons rather than business reasons (paraphrased). Not
disagreeing with you, just clarifying.
The bigger loophole I saw was that transit providers were excluded
from all the rules.
Put an AS in between you and your upstream who just does filtering for
you. They're a transit provider so they have no NN rules.
It was very frustrating to witness all the crazy theories about what
would happen. I wonder if anyone will have the sense to feel silly
about pontificating on Facebook when absolutely nothing changes.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Dennis Burgess" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: 12/15/2017 3:43:06 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Our NN statment
NN did not disallow you to block facebook, just have to disclose it.
J So it really did’ent do anything.
Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant
<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> –
MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE
For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
Office: 314-735-0270 <tel:(314)%20735-0270>
E-Mail: [email protected]
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 3:24 PM
To: af <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Our NN statment
Awesome! I think I'll go block Facebook, and see how that goes...
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Steve Jones
<[email protected]> wrote:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/12/15/net_neutrality_s_end_was_mostly_celebrated_by_the_far_right.html
<http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/12/15/net_neutrality_s_end_was_mostly_celebrated_by_the_far_right.html>
Apparently now we ISPs can lawfully block individual sites and will
do so with impunity.
These people with these petty ideas I dont think understand how
poorly granularity scales.
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]>
wrote:
I like this as well. I was thinking it would be a good idea to put
out a statement..
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Paul McCall <[email protected]>
wrote:
Yep, that is concise and effective
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gino A.
Villarini
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 7:57 AM
To:[email protected]
Subject: [AFMUG] Our NN statment
What do you guys think? Lots of customers calling!
Aeronet Statement on Net Neutrality
AeroNet, a ISP that provides advanced Internet services to
Business and individuals in PR, USVI and Miami, applauds any
action taken that promotes innovation and advancement of
connectivity for all consumers. In Aeronet’s 17 years of history,
our pricing structure has always been simple, unlimited and
without any toll gates. The placement and removal of Net
Neutrality rules have not and will not modify our pricing policy.
We maintain our commitment to provide the fastest and most
reliable service to our customers, with innovative solutions that
fulfill our customers needs.
Gino A. Villarini
President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
