+100

On 12/26/2017 9:35 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
Is this for production model? We rarely have call for to the Fluke certification tester but one of our partners has several for their large projects for schools.  We do have Fluke certifiers for our wiring plants so I appreciate the need for a lower cost but reliable version.

Jaime Solorza

On Dec 26, 2017 8:27 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Yea... Not really the same thing. I am talking certify not map. I
    am going to have to do some deep diving into the standards to do
    it I am sure. For instance, the most common test that CAT5 fails
    and CAT6 doesn't is the DB loss test on my fluke. The pi doesn't
    do analog so I know I'll need an ADC. I'll have to take a closer
    look at my fluke tomorrow and see what all it tests.

    If I can get past that might be neat to add some stuff like MOS
    scores or some such.


    On Tue, Dec 26, 2017, 9:15 PM Jaime Solorza
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=54830
        <https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=54830>


        Jaime Solorza

        On Dec 26, 2017 8:08 PM, "Lewis Bergman"
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            I now have a couple of projects for raspberry pi after my
            first time success.

            I was wandering what else might be good. I thought about
            my 8000 dollar fluke cable certifier and wonder how much
            of it's functionality could be duplicated by a pair of
            raspberry pi.

            I found a project called netpi which is more of a network
            tester but had some neat stuff. I think it would require a
            couple of ADC and RTC to do a bunch of the tests that my
            fluke does off the top of my head just to start with. I am
            not sure it is even possible, at least by me, but it seems
            like a worthwhile endeavor if it is possible. I am hoping
            to get some feedback from the genius pool who know a lot
            more than I about the low level phy stuff.

            The goal would be to actually be able to certify a cable,
            not just pair map and give distance to fault. I know some
            python but this would likely require many tests to run in
            something like C for speed I would assume.

            Thoughts?


Reply via email to