I am sure Chuck may chime in on this..

The gauge is what is different on some pairs cat5e vs cat6. The wire gauge on cat6 I believe on the 1 and 3 pairs are

larger than whats in cat5e which are all the same gauge.

So largely in part the loss can be based on capacity and resistance of the wire.  This I am sure is what is measured when trying to get DB reading.

I am sure by inducing a frequency of a given range at a certain TX power could be achieved by the Pi but I think some more electronics maybe involved.


On 12/26/2017 9:27 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:

Yea... Not really the same thing. I am talking certify not map. I am going to have to do some deep diving into the standards to do it I am sure. For instance, the most common test that CAT5 fails and CAT6 doesn't is the DB loss test on my fluke. The pi doesn't do analog so I know I'll need an ADC. I'll have to take a closer look at my fluke tomorrow and see what all it tests.

If I can get past that might be neat to add some stuff like MOS scores or some such.


On Tue, Dec 26, 2017, 9:15 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=54830


    Jaime Solorza

    On Dec 26, 2017 8:08 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I now have a couple of projects for raspberry pi after my
        first time success.

        I was wandering what else might be good. I thought about my
        8000 dollar fluke cable certifier and wonder how much of it's
        functionality could be duplicated by a pair of raspberry pi.

        I found a project called netpi which is more of a network
        tester but had some neat stuff. I think it would require a
        couple of ADC and RTC to do a bunch of the tests that my fluke
        does off the top of my head just to start with. I am not sure
        it is even possible, at least by me, but it seems like a
        worthwhile endeavor if it is possible. I am hoping to get some
        feedback from the genius pool who know a lot more than I about
        the low level phy stuff.

        The goal would be to actually be able to certify a cable, not
        just pair map and give distance to fault. I know some python
        but this would likely require many tests to run in something
        like C for speed I would assume.

        Thoughts?


Reply via email to