No, not production. I already own a fluke DTX1800 that does everything I
need a certified to do certified to gig. More of a challenge thing roo see
what it was cost to get it done, how much effort, etc. Then publish it and
make it available for those not able to afford such a tool.

We use ours all the time. I find I have less trouble when I start out with
certified cables on it VoIP compared to when we just go calling stuff up.
Same when we used to hang AP. Just prevents problems.

Anyways, just a project that seems worthwhile if reasonably possible.

On Tue, Dec 26, 2017, 9:48 PM Mitch Koep <[email protected]> wrote:

> +100
>
> On 12/26/2017 9:35 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>
> Is this for production model? We rarely have call for to the Fluke
> certification tester but one of our partners has several for their large
> projects for schools.  We do have Fluke certifiers for our wiring plants so
> I appreciate the need for a lower cost but reliable version.
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
>
> On Dec 26, 2017 8:27 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yea... Not really the same thing. I am talking certify not map. I am
>> going to have to do some deep diving into the standards to do it I am sure.
>> For instance, the most common test that CAT5 fails and CAT6 doesn't is the
>> DB loss test on my fluke. The pi doesn't do analog so I know I'll need an
>> ADC. I'll have to take a closer look at my fluke tomorrow and see what all
>> it tests.
>>
>> If I can get past that might be neat to add some stuff like MOS scores or
>> some such.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017, 9:15 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=54830
>>>
>>>
>>> Jaime Solorza
>>>
>>> On Dec 26, 2017 8:08 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I now have a couple of projects for raspberry pi after my first time
>>>> success.
>>>>
>>>> I was wandering what else might be good. I thought about my 8000 dollar
>>>> fluke cable certifier and wonder how much of it's functionality could be
>>>> duplicated by a pair of raspberry pi.
>>>>
>>>> I found a project called netpi which is more of a network tester but
>>>> had some neat stuff. I think it would require a couple of ADC and RTC to do
>>>> a bunch of the tests that my fluke does off the top of my head just to
>>>> start with. I am not sure it is even possible, at least by me, but it seems
>>>> like a worthwhile endeavor if it is possible. I am hoping to get some
>>>> feedback from the genius pool who know a lot more than I about the low
>>>> level phy stuff.
>>>>
>>>> The goal would be to actually be able to certify a cable, not just pair
>>>> map and give distance to fault. I know some python but this would likely
>>>> require many tests to run in something like C for speed I would assume.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to