I need to have about /19 worth of customers natted to as few V4s as is needed 
to make it work properly.

We currently have about 3 /21s I think.  Don’t want to have to buy a fourth.  

From: Dennis Burgess 
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 11:34 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv4 exhaust again

Mikrotik can do that, I have a router with 20k NAT rules natting two /21s to 
less than 254 ips .:) 

 

 

Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant 

MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

 

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net

Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com 

Office: 314-735-0270

E-Mail: [email protected] 

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George Skorup
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 12:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv4 exhaust again

 

Dual-stack and CGN? You can get 8:1, 16:1 or even 32:1 out of a single public 
IPv4 address. Give 8 customers 8k ports each, or 16 customer 4k ports each, 32 
customers 2k ports each. That's *source* ports, so they're not limited to 8k, 
4k or 2k connections total. You have to look at in both directions. 
10.10.10.10:1024 -> 8.8.8.8:53 and 10.10.10.10:1024 -> 8.8.4.4:53 mappings are 
both valid, and it obviously goes a lot deeper than that.

Seems to be a whole lot easier than some crazy NAT appliance that's running the 
whole network. I haven't done anything like this, but I'm considering it. I 
think Juniper even lets you do this with a couple commands? Yeah, I'm too cheap 
for that.

Something else to keep in mind is that most consumer grade routers still have a 
fairly limited connection table. My Cambium cnPilot router I have at home lets 
you adjust the max table size (up to 8192). Most are 2k or 4k. While even a 
low-end MikroTik will give you >100k.

On 1/15/2018 11:35 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

  Planning to buy another /21 or some such thing .... again ......

  �

  So going to attempt to NAT the whole frigging company. 

  �

  Seems like I am going in reverse here.

  �

  If we can make NAT work for most customers, then that will buy us time to 
build our magic V4 translator gateway box for a V6 only network.� 

  �

  Any suggestions on the best way to do this?

 

Reply via email to