For us, it goes a little further than 2.4, but not as far as 900. ----- Original Message ----- From: Mathew Howard To: af Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 10:46 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Memphis
It lives up to the promise of being reasonable priced LTE gear, and it works fine. If I had been expecting it to perform the same as 900mhz does (or did, when 900mhz was actually usable...) in NLOS, then I'd probably be a bit disappointed... being LTE, it does do better in NLOS than, say, Canopy 450 in 3.65ghz (I'd say it performs closer to what I'd expect from 2.4ghz, or a bit better), but no, it's nothing magical. On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Jason McKemie <[email protected]> wrote: It works as well as you would expect the 3.65 follow-up to wimax to work, and maybe then some. Nothing magical about the NLOS capabilities though. On Tuesday, January 16, 2018, <[email protected]> wrote: Did it live up to the promises? From: Mike Hammett Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 8:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Memphis Baicells ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:53:18 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Memphis What was that product that I think Rick and Patrick were both working with a couple of years ago that was supposed to be the be-all and end-all for NLOS /tree performance. Remember some preliminary test results then nothing. I just don't remember the brand or the outcome. Did it work? Is the company still around? -----Original Message----- From: Robert Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 11:16 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] Memphis Any wireless providers thereabout? I have a customer that is looking for a secondary besides Comcast and says there are too many trees and it's too flat for any wireless providers down there... Thanks, robert
