I am old school... still believe 900 will work better than 3.65 in NLOS. So the Cambium 900 solution isn't cutting it?
Jaime Solorza On Jan 16, 2018 10:05 AM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" <par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: > > if you have a lot of interference in the 900 band, it does work much > better than 900 LOL > fortunately our 900 still works pretty good here. We have one area where > it does not but it is due to an "operator" nearby > who does not believe in gps sync for canopy > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* ch...@wbmfg.com > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 16, 2018 10:57 AM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Memphis > > Too lazy to look for the batch of promises that were made during initial > testing, but I am pretty sure it was supposed to work much better than 900. > > *From:* CBB - Jay Fuller > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:50 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Memphis > > > For us, it goes a little further than 2.4, but not as far as 900. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Mathew Howard > *To:* af > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 16, 2018 10:46 AM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Memphis > > It lives up to the promise of being reasonable priced LTE gear, and it > works fine. If I had been expecting it to perform the same as 900mhz does > (or did, when 900mhz was actually usable...) in NLOS, then I'd probably be > a bit disappointed... being LTE, it does do better in NLOS than, say, > Canopy 450 in 3.65ghz (I'd say it performs closer to what I'd expect from > 2.4ghz, or a bit better), but no, it's nothing magical. > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Jason McKemie < > j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: > >> It works as well as you would expect the 3.65 follow-up to wimax to work, >> and maybe then some. Nothing magical about the NLOS capabilities though. >> >> >> On Tuesday, January 16, 2018, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >>> Did it live up to the promises? >>> >>> *From:* Mike Hammett >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 16, 2018 8:58 AM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Memphis >>> >>> Baicells >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *ch...@wbmfg.com >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:53:18 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Memphis >>> >>> What was that product that I think Rick and Patrick were both working >>> with a >>> couple of years ago that was supposed to be the be-all and end-all for >>> NLOS >>> /tree performance. >>> >>> Remember some preliminary test results then nothing. I just don't >>> remember >>> the brand or the outcome. >>> Did it work? >>> Is the company still around? >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Robert >>> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 11:16 PM >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: [AFMUG] Memphis >>> >>> Any wireless providers thereabout? I have a customer that is looking >>> for a secondary besides Comcast and says there are too many trees and >>> it's too flat for any wireless providers down there... >>> >>> Thanks, >>> robert >>> >>> >>> >> > >
