Yeah, I think mediawiki is the way to go. I started down that path once but not being well versed in Linux I stopped. We can get that implemented. I just hate losing corporate/institutional memory every time a tech decides to go to college or go to work for Google/Ebay/Adobe... (we ain’t called Silicon Slopes for nuthing)
From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:41 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki My objection is not about the cost, which is nominal, but about the principle of going down the path of what can become a business-critical function offloaded to a third party, where you don't have full access to your own database/back-end. On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: Confluence is only $10 for 10 users. That’s my recommendation. On Jan 20, 2018, at 12:26 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: Full mediawiki, the same software that runs the backend of wikipedia. If you are not a competent Linux sysadmin, you are going to want to get one to set it up and maintain it. It's vastly more powerful and extensible than a medium sized ISP could ever need. I predict we will see people here recommend Confluence and other commercial solutions, but in my opinion all proper wiki software for serious use should be composed of 100% BSD, GPL and Apache licensed software. On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: I want it to be in wiki format. An ongoing knowledge base. We had one at a former company and it was great. But I was not the one that installed it so I don’t know what is involved in that. From: Steve Jones Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki if its not public, i use OneNote its not in the wiki format but it logs changes, logs who made changes and allows multiuser access On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:06 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: What is the most pain free way to create a wiki?
