I can't say who, but one of the largest last-mile ISPs on the entire west coast (WA/OR/CA) uses mediawiki for nearly 100% of their internal documentation. Organized per POP.
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:44 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I think mediawiki is the way to go. I started down that path once > but not being well versed in Linux I stopped. We can get that > implemented. > I just hate losing corporate/institutional memory every time a tech > decides to go to college or go to work for Google/Ebay/Adobe... (we ain’t > called Silicon Slopes for nuthing) > > *From:* Eric Kuhnke > *Sent:* Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:41 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki > > My objection is not about the cost, which is nominal, but about the > principle of going down the path of what can become a business-critical > function offloaded to a third party, where you don't have full access to > your own database/back-end. > > > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Confluence is only $10 for 10 users. That’s my recommendation. >> >> On Jan 20, 2018, at 12:26 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Full mediawiki, the same software that runs the backend of wikipedia. If >> you are not a competent Linux sysadmin, you are going to want to get one to >> set it up and maintain it. It's vastly more powerful and extensible than a >> medium sized ISP could ever need. I predict we will see people here >> recommend Confluence and other commercial solutions, but in my opinion all >> proper wiki software for serious use should be composed of 100% BSD, GPL >> and Apache licensed software. >> >> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I want it to be in wiki format. An ongoing knowledge base. We had one >>> at a former company and it was great. But I was not the one that installed >>> it so I don’t know what is involved in that. >>> >>> *From:* Steve Jones >>> *Sent:* Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:14 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki >>> >>> if its not public, i use OneNote >>> its not in the wiki format but it logs changes, logs who made changes >>> and allows multiuser access >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:06 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> What is the most pain free way to create a wiki? >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >
