I’m not following. I have full access to the MySQL database for my Confluence installation. It runs on my servers - just like MediaWiki would.
> On Jan 20, 2018, at 12:41 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: > > My objection is not about the cost, which is nominal, but about the principle > of going down the path of what can become a business-critical function > offloaded to a third party, where you don't have full access to your own > database/back-end. > > > >> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: >> Confluence is only $10 for 10 users. That’s my recommendation. >> >>> On Jan 20, 2018, at 12:26 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Full mediawiki, the same software that runs the backend of wikipedia. If >>> you are not a competent Linux sysadmin, you are going to want to get one to >>> set it up and maintain it. It's vastly more powerful and extensible than a >>> medium sized ISP could ever need. I predict we will see people here >>> recommend Confluence and other commercial solutions, but in my opinion all >>> proper wiki software for serious use should be composed of 100% BSD, GPL >>> and Apache licensed software. >>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I want it to be in wiki format. An ongoing knowledge base. We had one at >>>> a former company and it was great. But I was not the one that installed >>>> it so I don’t know what is involved in that. >>>> >>>> From: Steve Jones >>>> Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:14 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki >>>> >>>> if its not public, i use OneNote >>>> its not in the wiki format but it logs changes, logs who made changes and >>>> allows multiuser access >>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:06 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> What is the most pain free way to create a wiki? >>>> >>>> >>> >
