We've been running Bitnami MediaWiki Stack  (
https://bitnami.com/stack/mediawiki  (locally hosted, not their cloud
service) )  + Semantic Mediawiki extension (
https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Semantic_MediaWiki) for the past
5-6 years now, working well for us.

--sent from my iPhone


On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Great flick
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Jan 21, 2018 1:01 PM, "Robert Andrews" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Followed by Major Kong riding the Bomb in....
>>
>> On 01/21/2018 08:21 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>
>>> Never considered the idea of giving the customers a good self support
>>> tool.  That is an astoundingly good idea.
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZct-itCwPE
>>> *From:* Jeremy
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, January 21, 2018 9:16 AM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki
>>> MindTouch (Deki) Wiki?  They have it in a ready-to-go linux turnkey
>>> distro.
>>> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Well then you may like Confluence - especially with the Gliffy
>>>     plugin which is awesome for diagrams!
>>>     On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
>>>     wrote:
>>>
>>>         My complaint with a wiki was that it was very clunky to add
>>>         non-text content.  I like to use a lot of diagrams and photos.
>>>         Might give this One Note thing a spin.
>>>         ------ Original Message ------
>>>         From: "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]>
>>>         To: [email protected]
>>>         Sent: 1/20/2018 12:49:45 PM
>>>         Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki
>>>
>>>>         I can't say who, but one of the largest last-mile ISPs on the
>>>>         entire west coast (WA/OR/CA) uses mediawiki for nearly 100% of
>>>>         their internal documentation. Organized per POP.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:44 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Yeah, I think mediawiki is the way to go.  I started down
>>>>             that path once but not being well versed in Linux I
>>>>             stopped.  We can get that implemented.
>>>>             I just hate losing corporate/institutional memory every
>>>>             time a tech decides to go to college or go to work for
>>>>             Google/Ebay/Adobe... (we ain’t called Silicon Slopes for
>>>>             nuthing)
>>>>             *From:* Eric Kuhnke
>>>>             *Sent:* Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:41 AM
>>>>             *To:* [email protected]
>>>>             *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki
>>>>
>>>>             My objection is not about the cost, which is nominal, but
>>>>             about the principle of going down the path of what can
>>>>             become a business-critical function offloaded to a third
>>>>             party, where you don't have full access to your own
>>>>             database/back-end.
>>>>
>>>>             On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Josh Baird
>>>>             <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Confluence is only $10 for 10 users.  That’s my
>>>>                 recommendation.
>>>>
>>>>                 On Jan 20, 2018, at 12:26 PM, Eric Kuhnke
>>>>                 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Full mediawiki, the same software that runs the
>>>>>                 backend of wikipedia. If you are not a competent
>>>>>                 Linux sysadmin, you are going to want to get one to
>>>>>                 set it up and maintain it. It's vastly more powerful
>>>>>                 and extensible than a medium sized ISP could ever
>>>>>                 need. I predict we will see people here recommend
>>>>>                 Confluence and other commercial solutions, but in my
>>>>>                 opinion all proper wiki software for serious use
>>>>>                 should be composed of 100% BSD, GPL and Apache
>>>>>                 licensed software.
>>>>>                 On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:16 AM, <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>                     I want it to be in wiki format.  An ongoing
>>>>>                     knowledge base.  We had one at a former company
>>>>>                     and it was great. But I was not the one that
>>>>>                     installed it so I don’t know what is involved in
>>>>>                     that.
>>>>>                     *From:* Steve Jones
>>>>>                     *Sent:* Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:14 AM
>>>>>                     *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>                     *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki
>>>>>                     if its not public, i use OneNote
>>>>>                     its not in the wiki format but it logs changes,
>>>>>                     logs who made changes and allows multiuser access
>>>>>                     On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:06 AM,
>>>>>                     <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>                         What is the most pain free way to create a
>>>>> wiki?
>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to