Followed by Major Kong riding the Bomb in....

On 01/21/2018 08:21 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Never considered the idea of giving the customers a good self support tool. That is an astoundingly good idea.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZct-itCwPE
*From:* Jeremy
*Sent:* Sunday, January 21, 2018 9:16 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki
MindTouch (Deki) Wiki?  They have it in a ready-to-go linux turnkey distro.
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote:

    Well then you may like Confluence - especially with the Gliffy
    plugin which is awesome for diagrams!
    On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
    wrote:

        My complaint with a wiki was that it was very clunky to add
        non-text content.  I like to use a lot of diagrams and photos.
        Might give this One Note thing a spin.
        ------ Original Message ------
        From: "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]>
        To: [email protected]
        Sent: 1/20/2018 12:49:45 PM
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki
        I can't say who, but one of the largest last-mile ISPs on the
        entire west coast (WA/OR/CA) uses mediawiki for nearly 100% of
        their internal documentation. Organized per POP.


        On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:44 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

            Yeah, I think mediawiki is the way to go.  I started down
            that path once but not being well versed in Linux I
            stopped.  We can get that implemented.
            I just hate losing corporate/institutional memory every
            time a tech decides to go to college or go to work for
            Google/Ebay/Adobe... (we ain’t called Silicon Slopes for
            nuthing)
            *From:* Eric Kuhnke
            *Sent:* Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:41 AM
            *To:* [email protected]
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki
            My objection is not about the cost, which is nominal, but
            about the principle of going down the path of what can
            become a business-critical function offloaded to a third
            party, where you don't have full access to your own
            database/back-end.

            On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Josh Baird
            <[email protected]> wrote:

                Confluence is only $10 for 10 users.  That’s my
                recommendation.

                On Jan 20, 2018, at 12:26 PM, Eric Kuhnke
                <[email protected]> wrote:

                Full mediawiki, the same software that runs the
                backend of wikipedia. If you are not a competent
                Linux sysadmin, you are going to want to get one to
                set it up and maintain it. It's vastly more powerful
                and extensible than a medium sized ISP could ever
                need. I predict we will see people here recommend
                Confluence and other commercial solutions, but in my
                opinion all proper wiki software for serious use
                should be composed of 100% BSD, GPL and Apache
                licensed software.
                On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

                    I want it to be in wiki format.  An ongoing
                    knowledge base.  We had one at a former company
                    and it was great. But I was not the one that
                    installed it so I don’t know what is involved in
                    that.
                    *From:* Steve Jones
                    *Sent:* Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:14 AM
                    *To:* [email protected]
                    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki
                    if its not public, i use OneNote
                    its not in the wiki format but it logs changes,
                    logs who made changes and allows multiuser access
                    On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:06 AM,
                    <[email protected]> wrote:

                        What is the most pain free way to create a wiki?

Reply via email to