--On Sunday, July 20, 2008 05:02:13 PM -0500 "Christopher D. Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Simon Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not simply require voters to be on the list some period of time
before any vote actually occurs?  Like a month?  Or two months?  Or
one week preceding the first announcement about the vote?

That's there already ...
   Eligibility to vote is determined by membership of the
   standardisation group on the 1st of July of the appropriate year.

(Elections take place in late August)

The above sounds sufficient to me.  What was the previous poster worried
about?  A large number of people joining the list two months ahead of
time in order to vote?

Yes, in part, but if the group doesn't think vote-packing is a big enough problem to worry about, I'll drop it. However, there's also the reverse problem -- people may be reading through archive or gateway services, instead of being subscribed directly, and we shouldn't disenfranchise those people.

Having a single "magic date" also concerns me; what if for some reason you are not subscribed on that date? A time range works better, IMHO.

-- Jeff

_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization

Reply via email to