On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Jeffrey Altman < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The discussion on gaming the system is a rat-hole. We are not a large > enough community for this to have significant meaning to us. If we end up > with 100 individuals subscribed to this list I will be shocked. > I just wanted it to be clear that I thought there was a potential abuse case if we let the foundation handle process abuse. Not necessarily a likely one. I can live with it if others can. > > I am a bit concerned about systems such as Nabble. We do not want to > permit the Nabble service to be used to send a vote and individuals who read > via Nabble will not have a vote. I believe it is reasonable to require a > personal subscription to the list if one wants to be considered a voting > eligible participant. > > If we can't send an e-mail to you based upon the registered address on the > specified date, then you can't vote. > What if you work at Columbia and your NAS breaks?
_______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
