Jeffrey Hutzelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Similarly, maybe it would be better to use "subscribed or posted" as a
> test; in they way, we exclude neither people who lurk without saying
> much nor people who read via some kind of gateway (but we do still
> exclude people who read via a gateway and never post; I think that's an
> acceptable limitation).

I vote for this.  If it causes problems, we can always change it later
(perhaps not with some difficulty, but we won't be able to figure out in
advance every contingency).

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization

Reply via email to