-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I've re-read the document, and discussion, and would support the proposal as amended.
(I notably have not been involved in IETF or comparable standards work, so my support is of less significance than others'. The list has been very quiet, however.) Matt Simon Wilkinson wrote: > I'm intending on making the next editing pass on the standardisation > document this weekend. It would be very helpful if people could let me > know of any additional open issues. > > The only open issue of which I am currently aware is the question of > whether there are any more open issues. However, this is sufficiently > self-perpetuating that I intend to ignore it :) > > Please do take the time to have another read of the document and let me > know any further comments. > > Thanks, > > Simon. > > > _______________________________________________ > AFS3-standardization mailing list > [email protected] > http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization > - -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIrDM0JiSUUSaRdSURCHl9AJ9YD+Kizz26E6BLVipam9NEWqzJMQCffWAH kQwa2FmEXoxNrtYsLM9gh/4= =ADTE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
