> > Am I the only one who has been finding this too damn complicated? > > My suggestion: Every time we need to standardize something in AFS, we > lock the Jeffs, Derrick, and Russ in a room. Anyone who objects to this > process gets locked in the room with them. No one is allowed to leave > the room until the appropriate document is completed. We can call this > the "Steel Cage Match" process. >
This might be a good plan, until we have a freak accident wherein a city bus somehow finds itself launched into the room, and there are no survivors. > The Registrars are specified in the proposal as: > "The registrars would be initially comprised of the current registrar, > plus a representative from each of the currently available AFS > implementations (IBM, OpenAFS, kAFS and Arla)" > Actually, valid point raised above. Suppose there aren't representatives available/willing/able to represent one or more of the current AFS implementations? -- Jacob Thebault-Spieker Cell: (320) 288-6412 http://summatusmentis.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
