On 8 Jun 2009, at 03:05, Russ Allbery wrote:
The problem is that, because these fields are not and
were not standardized at all and existing software would ignore them,
people may have used them.

The interesting thing here is that this approach pretty much makes all of the unused or spare protocol fields unusable. I can completely see the justification for it, but it does significantly reduce our flexibility, both now and in the future.

S.


_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization

Reply via email to