On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Hartmut Reuter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> To be practical I would say for the moment the important message is that we
> had a community consensus about accepting
> draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names-07 so that someone can start to work
> on this base.
>
> Of course, it would be nice to get our accepted standardizations published
> one day, but Derrick's draft will stay on the IETF page until June 2 (when
> it expires). So there is still much time to find a solution for the final
> place where to store those things!

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names-08 (when
the page appears, it has been submitted already) changes to
intended status experimental, and otherwise matches the 7 bis which
achieved consensus previously.
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization

Reply via email to