-09 in a moment with only that change. On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Simon Wilkinson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 7 Mar 2011, at 21:40, Derrick Brashear wrote: > >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names-08 (when >> the page appears, it has been submitted already) changes to >> intended status experimental, and otherwise matches the 7 bis which >> achieved consensus previously. > > Okay, so this isn't the way to go about this. "Experimental" refers to the > IETF's stream of "Experimental" RFCs - it's an IETF track, that we shouldn't > be publishing in. My understanding is that in order to use the independent > submissions track all of our documents have to be "Informational" - so I > suspect you'll be getting a load of queries from puzzled IETFers around about > now. > > My understanding was that in order to move this forwards, our working group > chairs were going to talk to the Independent Submissions Editor. Has anyone > started on that yet? > > Cheers, > > Simon. > >
-- Derrick _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
