On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Simon Wilkinson <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry Tom, but this ship has sailed. We had a consensus call, and agreed to > advance the draft. In theory this means that the registrars have assigned > code points for the versions of the RPCs contained in the document we > declared done. >
So, what are we going to do about the GetCapabilities issue? A compliant implementation could cache this data forever, which is.....preposterous. Can we can handle this via the RFC errata process? -Tom _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
