Sorry, this slipped under my radar. The latest draft of this addresses all of my earlier concerns, and as such I support its publication.
S. On 26 Jul 2011, at 14:25, "Douglas E. Engert" <[email protected]> wrote: > This call for consensus was to extend to 7/25 yesterday. > So far I have only seen 2 "OK" responses from Derrick Brashear > and David Boyes, and a "why are we doing this" from an outsider. > > In the view of this chair, that does not constitute a consensus, > and I will extend the call till Friday 7/29. > > > On 7/15/2011 1:11 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote: >> We have a request to proceed with a call for consensus on: >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deason-afs3-type-time/ >> >> >> Our draft procedures say a call should last at least 1 week, >> and this being Friday afternoon, I would like to extend the >> period to Monday, 7/25/2011. >> >> >> Consensus as used by the IETF is not a vote but a general agreement >> by the working group that the draft has addressed all issues. >> If there is someone who strongly disagrees with some issue the group >> should make ever effort to understand the issue even if the one making >> the point is having trouble expressing the issue. >> >> Members should read the document and if you have issues please state >> them and indicate what needs to be changed. If you have no issues, let >> us know that too. >> >> Please respond using the subject from this e-mail. >> > > -- > > Douglas E. Engert <[email protected]> > Argonne National Laboratory > 9700 South Cass Avenue > Argonne, Illinois 60439 > (630) 252-5444 > _______________________________________________ > AFS3-standardization mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
