On 8/18/2011 1:20 PM, David Boyes wrote: >> As an elector, it would help me in casting my vote if the candidates would be >> prepared to say something on the list about their vision for the >> standardisation process, what time they are prepared to devote to the job, >> and how they think we can best move things forwards. > > While an excellent idea, it's not in the process right now. Since we have > already started the voting, shouldn't we postpone introducing this until next > time (and put this in the charter doc)? > > -- db
I see no reason why people who are running for an office should feel it within their own powers to communicate with those they are intending to serve. A failure to respond to a request from the community is an indication to me that I shouldn't vote for the unresponsive nominee. It has nothing to do with what is or is not required by the process. Jeffrey Altman
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
