> The only "penalty" is that Jeff won't vote for them; nowhere do I see that > Jeff is suggesting that such candidates would be disqualified or anything like > that. Jeff is just expressing a desire as a voter, as far as I can read.
Which prima facie gives the people who do supply a statement an advantage in that at least one voter will not vote for a candidate that does not supply a statement. > It seems > good that voters express such opinions, so candidates know what the voters > are specifically looking for, if anything. Agreed. But then all candidates should supply them. > I don't envision myself caring about position statements, but if Jeff does, > then... good for him. I would like them too. But I want them from all candidates so that I'm comparing apples to apples, and that every candidate has an equal probability of receiving votes from all the electors. _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
