> One alternative might be a (built-in) hold between > the candidates being announced and voting beginning > to allow the candidates to state their positions on list. > Another might be that the chairs ask that as part > of the acceptance of the nomination the potential > candidate is offered an opportunity to provide a > statement that the chair would include in the > formal "election has started" email.
Either of these options seem reasonable for next time. I do still think that if we use them, we should officially add them to the process._______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
